Evidence of Learning

Attendance is not evidence of understanding.

UCALP distinguishes attendance, completion, reviewable contribution, demonstrated capability, outcome, and impact.

  1. Attendance

    Confirms that a person was present. It does not prove understanding or competence.

  2. Completion

    Confirms that defined requirements were completed. It does not automatically prove transfer or independent ability.

  3. Reviewable Contribution

    Confirms that the participant produced something that can be examined, discussed, corrected, and potentially used: article, experiment, analysis, guide, workshop, prototype, or field documentation.

  4. Demonstrated Capability

    Requires evidence that the participant can explain, apply, compare, justify, identify limitations, detect or correct error, respond to review, and transfer understanding to a different case.

  5. Outcome

    Requires evidence of change in knowledge, ability, practice, confidence, or participation. An outcome is what changed because the activity occurred.

  6. Impact

    Requires broader evidence, time, context, contribution analysis, and consideration of other causes. Impact is the portion of change reasonably attributable to the program.

Learning should be evidenced through what a participant can understand, explain, apply, examine, produce, revise, or return to others — not through attendance alone.